How To Eat Well As A Starving Artist

The starving artist is a concept that has old roots.  The idea of pursuing a life making art and suffering the financial consequences has been romanticized in movies and popular culture. 

As a consumer of art my favorite art form is music, by far.  Radio was my only access to new music growing up in the 1970’s and 80’s, and if an artist was being played on the radio back then they were far from starving.  To get big enough to have radio play meant you had already blown up, or will very soon.  Led Zeppelin and Billy Joel were the farthest thing from starving you could imagine. 

Times slowly changed and what was called “alternative” music became more and more common as the internet matured and new discovery channels emerged.  Fast forward to now and what we call “indie” music – short for “independent” – is everywhere. 

Right now if you want you can record a song on your laptop and upload it to Spotify.  It will be available to the world right alongside major musical acts. 

Though music discovery has been democratized, it’s created more starving artists than ever.  Just because you can upload your song to Spotify or Bandcamp doesn’t mean anyone is going to listen.

 

Starving, Really?

The median income for a musician in America is approximately $20,000 – $25,000 per year.  Most musicians are indie musicians, they’re not celebrities signed to a major record label.  The federal poverty line is $13,590, so that means the average musician is not quite making twice the minimum poverty line income. 

And my assumption is that this income figure for musicians is pre-tax.  Although taxes are very low on that income level there are still taxes to pay, so their post-tax income is even less.

Let’s be honest, can anyone really live on $23,000 a year?  Can someone cover the bear essentials like paying rent and having enough for food and basic clothing on $23k?  

There are folks in the personal finance community who claim they spend less than that per year.  But again, in order to spend $23,000 you have to make more than that to cover taxes. 

The point here – is the average musician a starving artist?  Well, quite possibly yes. 

They might not actually be starving, but most musicians either work another job, are on welfare, or have an arrangement that allows them to live on a meager income such as free rent. 

And let’s not forget that covid hit musicians especially hard since so many make money by playing live.  Many have still not recovered.

  

Be An Artist, Pass On The Starving

So how can you become an artist and avoid the starving part?  You do what I did and start your artist career after you’re already financially independent. 

In 2021 I made $20,743 as a graphic artist, about the same as the median income for musicians in America according to the numbers.  But unlike most of those musicians I don’t struggle to make ends meet.  Yes I still work a part time job that pays pretty well, but even if I didn’t have that income I’d be just fine thanks. 

I’ve got FU money, and quite a bit of it. 

So I’m not a starving artist, I’m a well-fed artist who has to muster lots of discipline to not be overfed.  And no matter how hard I try I still can’t get over feeling a bit douchy referring to myself as an artist.  But putting “well-fed” in front of it makes it sound less douchy somehow 🙂 

If you are one of those artistically blessed individuals who insists on making art your main career from a young age, well good luck.  I sincerely hope you succeed.  A high school friend of mine made it work and still works as an art director for a major corporation, but it’s a tough career path. 

In the end, if you have any artistic ambitions it’s better to be a well-fed artist than a starving one.  And you can do that by saving money from your main job and putting yourself on a path to FI. 

Subscribe To New Posts Here!

Dave @ Accidental FIRE

I reached financial independence and semi-retired in my mid-40's through hard work, smart living, and investing. This blog chronicles my journey and explores many aspects of personal finance including the psychological and behavioral factors that drive our habits.

You may also like...

13 Responses

  1. I spent three and a half years on a PhD stipend of $20k per year, living in Australia which had a pretty high cost of living even back then. It’s doable, but you can’t really build a financial future on it. Grateful for that time though as it set me in a frugal lifestyle even after I started earning a good wage.

    • Dave @ Accidental FIRE says:

      Wow, those were probably lean times but also likely taught you about wants vs needs. Thanks for the comment!

  2. i married a painter, as you know. she lived in a $300 apartment in the hood for many years because it had a studio space. she always painted but also always worked a regular job and was able to buy this house we live in now due to frugality and sacrifice. it can be done if you don’t care about the yuppie perks of life.

  3. I’d be a starving writer if I hadn’t FIRE’d first. Nice to have the financial freedom to do anything that inspires you, regardless of how much income it generates. True freedom, indeed, and I’ve found “pursuing passions” is one of the real joys of being FI.

  4. Kay says:

    My husband and I lived on about this pre-kids. I worked a few hours a week and we just played gigs. We got into a niche playing weddings and that worked out well. Then we got pregnant and decided to get something more stable with insurance. But they were definitely fun times and we learned a lot. We ended up keeping the music gig going on the side.

    • Dave @ Accidental FIRE says:

      Wow that’s so cool Kay! I’ve always dreamed of making living as a musician and even though I’ve been in a few bands I’ve never managed to get paid for playing music – yet 🙂 So cool to hear you have side income from being a musician and hope you keep it going!

  5. Amen Dave, though I think things may be looking better for Artists from a financial perspective, by way NFT’s. NFT’s allow Artists of all kinds to turn their Art in a digital format (NFT) and always maintain the status of ‘rightful owner’, because the NFT is recorded on an ‘immutable blockchain’. The artist will get royalties anytime their Art is used, downloaded, bought, etc. Royalty Payment goes directly to the wallet addressed originally set up and associated with the creation of the NFT. Even upon death, the royalties go to the wallet, and assuming the family controls the wallet ,they will keep getting royalty payments. No more third parties getting their hands in the pot. I think it’s a great time to be an Artist, maybe there will be less ‘Starting Artists” because of NFT’s. Here’s to hoping!

    • Dave @ Accidental FIRE says:

      Yes, NFTs hold great promise for artists, but we have to get past the hype-phase first. Like any new technology or thing there’s an initial crazy-phase where all kinds of stupid crap happens – that’s what NFTs are in now. Because of the hype-phase many folks have written them off as silly etc but I think with blockchain behind them they are indeed a surefire way to move artist ownership and copyright etc forward. Another issue holding them back is that they are fully tied to crypto, and the recent collapse of the big crypto market won’t help things. In the end I’m sick and tired of my art being stolen online and sold by bots and criminals, and NFTs are a way to stop that, but we have along way to go. Thanks for the great comment!

  6. Joe says:

    $23,000 doesn’t go very far these days. I guess artists work part time to make ends meet. There are plenty of ways to make money with gigs and part time work.

Drop Me A Comment - What's On Your Mind?

Verified by MonsterInsights